Skip to content

Glossary

Crossover trial

A crossover trial is a randomized study in which each participant receives two or more interventions in turn, such as a supplement and then a placebo, so that each person serves as their own comparison.

What it means in practice

Parallel-group trials give each participant one intervention, while crossover trials give each participant a sequence of interventions [3]. The simplest version is the AB/BA design: participants are randomized to start on A or B, then switch to the other [3].

Because each participant acts as their own control, a crossover trial needs fewer participants than a parallel-group trial to reach the same statistical power [1]. The design brings its own problems. Carry-over is when the effect of the first intervention persists into the second period, so the result depends on the order in which treatments were received [1]. A period effect is when the outcome changes over time regardless of treatment [1]. A washout is a gap between periods with no treatment, meant to let the first treatment wear off [1].

Cochrane's handbook describes the design as suited to interventions with a temporary effect in stable, chronic conditions, and warns that carry-over is likely when a substance has a very long elimination half-life [3].

Why it matters when reading nootropics research

A trial might report that the same volunteers completed attention tests after a supplement on one visit and after a placebo on another. That is a crossover design, and it is only as good as its handling of order effects.

Reporting has often been thin. In a review of 116 randomized crossover trials indexed in MEDLINE in December 2000, the median sample size was 15, carry-over was addressed in the methods of 29% of trials, and 70% reported and defended a washout period [2]. Only 29% gave confidence intervals or standard errors that would let the data enter a meta-analysis [2]. A CONSORT extension now sets out what crossover reports should include, with a modified flowchart and baseline table [1].

Things to check: how long the washout was, how the design and analysis addressed carry-over and period effects, and whether the analysis accounted for repeated measurements from the same people.

References

  1. Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ. 2019.PMID 31366597DOI 10.1136/bmj.l4378Tier 1
  2. Mills EJ, Chan AW, Wu P, et al. Design, analysis, and presentation of crossover trials. Trials. 2009.PMID 19405975DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-10-27Tier 1, narrative review
  3. Cochrane. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Chapter 23: Including variants on randomized trials. October 2019 (chapter last updated).SourceTier 1

Articles that mention this term

All glossary terms